R7-4700U(ES) 跑分记录
环境
ESXi 6.7
CentOS 7.9.2009 (8C+32G 3200+200G,ES版的U似乎比普通版基础频率低0.2G)
Unixbench 5.1.3
跑分情况
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com 1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Process Creation 1 2 3 1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3 1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3 8 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3 8 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3 8 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3 8 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3 8 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 x Process Creation 1 2 3 8 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3 8 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3 ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: localhost.localdomain: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 3.10.0-1160.el7.x86_64 -- #1 SMP Mon Oct 19 16:18:59 UTC 2020 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: AMD Eng Sample (3593.2 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 1: AMD Eng Sample (3593.2 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 2: AMD Eng Sample (3593.2 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 3: AMD Eng Sample (3593.2 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 4: AMD Eng Sample (3593.2 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 5: AMD Eng Sample (3593.2 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 6: AMD Eng Sample (3593.2 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 7: AMD Eng Sample (3593.2 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET 23:09:25 up 0 min, 4 users, load average: 0.07, 0.02, 0.01; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: 日 8月 27 2023 23:09:25 - 23:39:46 8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 46135494.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2825.9 MWIPS (24.5 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 1999.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1249113.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 363500.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2749127.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2150362.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 327075.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 15711.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5762.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3309.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 3257428.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 46135494.0 3953.3 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2825.9 513.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 1999.9 465.1 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1249113.1 3154.3 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 363500.4 2196.4 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2749127.2 4739.9 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2150362.0 1728.6 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 327075.9 817.7 Process Creation 126.0 15711.7 1247.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5762.2 1359.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3309.7 5516.2 System Call Overhead 15000.0 3257428.4 2171.6 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1761.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: 日 8月 27 2023 23:39:46 - 00:08:22 8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 227154321.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 30302.6 MWIPS (13.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 21291.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1533770.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 427137.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3986420.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 10960545.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 1802490.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 56866.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 34078.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4780.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 12009945.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 227154321.9 19464.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 30302.6 5509.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 21291.7 4951.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1533770.4 3873.2 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 427137.7 2580.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3986420.5 6873.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 10960545.7 8810.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1802490.2 4506.2 Process Creation 126.0 56866.3 4513.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 34078.3 8037.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4780.9 7968.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 12009945.2 8006.6 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 6219.8
放张腾讯云轻量应用2c4g的对比图
总结
性价比不错,而且够迷你,内存配大点,1200的成本装ESXI开了几个虚拟机无压力。
本来服务都在云服务器上跑的,现在移到本地来,内网穿透+反向代理把服务端口映射出去。